<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volatility and Market Fluctuations are Great for Retail Investors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investing-school.com/lessons/volatility-and-market-fluctuations-are-great-for-retail-investors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investing-school.com/lessons/volatility-and-market-fluctuations-are-great-for-retail-investors/</link>
	<description>To Learn as Much as We Can About The Complicated Subject of Investing!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://investing-school.com/lessons/volatility-and-market-fluctuations-are-great-for-retail-investors/comment-page-1/#comment-4827</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investing-school.com/?p=513#comment-4827</guid>
		<description>Technically this might not be dollar-cost-averaging. DCA is what you do when you have a lump sum and decide to buy into the market slowly rather than invest it all at once. While somewhat more conservative, on average this is a losing move. Buying in today is better than buying in tomorrow, on average. Unless you are highly concerned about the market&#039;s immediate future, it&#039;s not necessarily a great idea.

Instead your two examples were probably exercising automatic investing - investing new wealth as they earned it and without regard for market direction. That is a *great* idea and brings about good results over the long term. There&#039;s a lot of data out there about how DCA is a bad idea, but it&#039;s all based on the notion that you have a choice to invest today, but decide to spread it out instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically this might not be dollar-cost-averaging. DCA is what you do when you have a lump sum and decide to buy into the market slowly rather than invest it all at once. While somewhat more conservative, on average this is a losing move. Buying in today is better than buying in tomorrow, on average. Unless you are highly concerned about the market&#8217;s immediate future, it&#8217;s not necessarily a great idea.</p>
<p>Instead your two examples were probably exercising automatic investing &#8211; investing new wealth as they earned it and without regard for market direction. That is a *great* idea and brings about good results over the long term. There&#8217;s a lot of data out there about how DCA is a bad idea, but it&#8217;s all based on the notion that you have a choice to invest today, but decide to <a href="http://investing-school.com/definition/bid-ask-spread/" >spread</a> it out instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://investing-school.com/lessons/volatility-and-market-fluctuations-are-great-for-retail-investors/comment-page-1/#comment-4781</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 18:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investing-school.com/?p=513#comment-4781</guid>
		<description>Great post!  I wish people would just stop taking money out AFTER the market crashes and buy them back AFTER the market does well.  Sigh.  Hopefully they will learn some day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  I wish people would just stop taking money out AFTER the market crashes and buy them back AFTER the market does well.  Sigh.  Hopefully they will learn some day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObliviousInvestor</title>
		<link>http://investing-school.com/lessons/volatility-and-market-fluctuations-are-great-for-retail-investors/comment-page-1/#comment-4778</link>
		<dc:creator>ObliviousInvestor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investing-school.com/?p=513#comment-4778</guid>
		<description>Excellent points! DCA&#039;ing downward into an individual stock is a risky proposition. DCA&#039;ing downward into a broadly-diversified index fund is far less scary. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points! DCA&#8217;ing downward into an individual stock is a risky proposition. DCA&#8217;ing downward into a broadly-diversified <a href="http://investing-school.com/definition/index-funds/" >index fund</a> is far less scary. <img src='http://investing-school.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
